<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confucianism in Chinese Academia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thechinabeat.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510</link>
	<description>Blogging How the East Is Read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeleine Dong</title>
		<link>http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510&#038;cpage=1#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeleine Dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out these connections.  It all makes goos sense and yes, no need to wonder then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out these connections.  It all makes goos sense and yes, no need to wonder then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The China Beat</title>
		<link>http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510&#038;cpage=1#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>The China Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510#comment-841</guid>
		<description>A response from Daniel Bell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No need to wonder, better to consult the book itself. Richard Nisbett and Peng Kaiping have collaborated on some experiments discussed in the Geography of Thought (the book itself mentions Prof. Peng on several occasions). Prof. Peng is professor at Berkeley and is now starting a department of psychology at Tsinghua and he supports his arguments with rigorous experiments. Dr. Wu Shali recently graduated from the University of Chicao and also supports her arguments with rigorous experiments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A response from Daniel Bell</p>
<p>No need to wonder, better to consult the book itself. Richard Nisbett and Peng Kaiping have collaborated on some experiments discussed in the Geography of Thought (the book itself mentions Prof. Peng on several occasions). Prof. Peng is professor at Berkeley and is now starting a department of psychology at Tsinghua and he supports his arguments with rigorous experiments. Dr. Wu Shali recently graduated from the University of Chicao and also supports her arguments with rigorous experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510&#038;cpage=1#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Peng Kaiping is a Berkeley psychology professor and Director of the Culture and Cognition Lab there, so I guess he used experiments as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peng Kaiping is a Berkeley psychology professor and Director of the Culture and Cognition Lab there, so I guess he used experiments as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeleine Dong</title>
		<link>http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510&#038;cpage=1#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeleine Dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=510#comment-839</guid>
		<description>The arguments of Peng Kaiping and Wu Shali, that &quot;there are striking cognitive differences between Chinese and Americans, with Chinese more likely to use contextual and dialectical approaches to solving problems,&quot; sound surprisingly similar to those presented in the book The Geography of Thought : How Asians and Westerners Think Differently...and Why (2003) by University of Michigan professor Richard Nisbett.  Nisbett based his arguments on experiments; one wonders how Peng and Wu reached their conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arguments of Peng Kaiping and Wu Shali, that &quot;there are striking cognitive differences between Chinese and Americans, with Chinese more likely to use contextual and dialectical approaches to solving problems,&quot; sound surprisingly similar to those presented in the book The Geography of Thought : How Asians and Westerners Think Differently&#8230;and Why (2003) by University of Michigan professor Richard Nisbett.  Nisbett based his arguments on experiments; one wonders how Peng and Wu reached their conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

